This article is astounding on several levels, the central one being that Goldman Sachs possibly over stated its mortgage losses, which were insured by AIG, not only because there WERE in fact losses which should have been covered, but because the greater the losses known to the public the lower the market would go — which Goldman had bets on. In other words, by adding to the panic in the markets — by overstating its own losses– it would be able to profit.
It is also sort of amazing to wonder how exactly, in any situation like this, when an insured claims a loss, the insurer determines the value. In the case of loss of a car, or a house, there is something physical to look at, comparative values, etc. In the case of Goldman Sachs and AIG it seems there are only financial statements, created by the insured, Goldman Sachs, which refused to let a third party evaluate them. Sounds like a perfect scenario for ripping off the tax payer.
Well before the federal government bailed out A.I.G. in September 2008, Goldman’s demands for billions of dollars from the insurer helped put it in a precarious financial position by bleeding much-needed cash. That ultimately provoked the government to step in.
With taxpayer assistance to A.I.G. currently totaling $180 billion, regulatory and Congressional scrutiny of Goldman’s role in the insurer’s downfall is increasing. The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining the payment demands that a number of firms — most prominently Goldman — made during 2007 and 2008 as the mortgage market imploded.
The S.E.C. wants to know whether any of the demands improperly distressed the mortgage market, according to people briefed on the matter who requested anonymity because the inquiry was intended to be confidential.
In just the year before the A.I.G. bailout, Goldman collected more than $7 billion from A.I.G. And Goldman received billions more after the rescue. Though other banks also benefited, Goldman received more taxpayer money, $12.9 billion, than any other firm.
In addition, according to two people with knowledge of the positions, a portion of the $11 billion in taxpayer money that went to Société Générale, a French bank that traded with A.I.G., was subsequently transferred to Goldman under a deal the two banks had struck.
Goldman stood to gain from the housing market’s implosion because in late 2006, the firm had begun to make huge trades that would pay off if the mortgage market soured. The further mortgage securities’ prices fell, the greater were Goldman’s profits.
NYTimes: Morgenson
The SEC is examining some of this activity. Please send it calcium supplements to keep its teeth nice and strong.
In other Goldman Sachs news the financial world is astounded, ASTOUNDED!, that Llloyd Blankfein, CEO of the raptor of Wall Street, is only being paid a $9 million bonus.
“We really aren’t deaf and blind,” said Goldman Chief Financial Officer David Viniar in January, when the company released its 2009 results. “We see what is going on around us and on and we hear what regulators and the world is saying.”
Besides Viniar’s insult to the deaf and blind who understand far better than he what is going on around them it seems he has his analogs confused. He might have said, for example, “We really aren’t poisonous vipers,” or, “We really aren’t as abysmally ignorant as it seems…”
*
For an excellent series on Goldman Sachs, including some video, see this McClatchy link The McClatchy series triggered a new investigation by Carl Levin’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations