<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very Strange Voting in Alaska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/</link>
	<description>Reclaiming American Democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-62256</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/#comment-62256</guid>
		<description>Helen,

What&#039;s confusing here, I suspect, is use of the word &quot;delta,&quot; which in this context means &quot;change in&quot; or &quot;difference of&quot;. What Nate Silver is saying in his geekish way (click on the link after his name in red) is that between the pre-election polling and the actual election result there was a swing of about 14% in the Republican&#039;s favor. It would be odd, to say the least, for pre-election polls to be that far off. Something smells fishy, and Silver floats several hypotheses as to what might have gone on.

Hey, Ms. Giambruni, great to see you posting here! Any time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen,</p>
<p>What&#8217;s confusing here, I suspect, is use of the word &#8220;delta,&#8221; which in this context means &#8220;change in&#8221; or &#8220;difference of&#8221;. What Nate Silver is saying in his geekish way (click on the link after his name in red) is that between the pre-election polling and the actual election result there was a swing of about 14% in the Republican&#8217;s favor. It would be odd, to say the least, for pre-election polls to be that far off. Something smells fishy, and Silver floats several hypotheses as to what might have gone on.</p>
<p>Hey, Ms. Giambruni, great to see you posting here! Any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Giambruni</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-62254</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Giambruni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthgroup.org/2008/11/06/very-strange-voting-in-alaska/#comment-62254</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand what those three results are supposed to prove. That the figures changed surprisingly little despite different districts? And what were the predictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand what those three results are supposed to prove. That the figures changed surprisingly little despite different districts? And what were the predictions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

